LAUSR

OBJECTIVE Small airway dysfunction is a pathological component of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and impulse oscillometry is an easy-to-administer, effort-independent non-invasive test reflecting small airway dysfunction. We aimed to compare the impulse oscillometry (IOS) measurements between COPD and IPF patients and investigate their correlation with severity of both diseases and other conventional parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a prospective, longitudinal study. We longitudinally evaluated the baseline demographic characteristics, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, Pulmonary Function Test (PFT), Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO), Hemogram and Impulse Oscillometry measurements of the patients diagnosed with COPD and IPF. RESULTS The study included 60 IPF patients and 48 COPD patients. The CAT and mMRC scores were higher in COPD patients. The majority of COPD patients were classified into Category B (46%), while 68% of IPF patients had Stage 1 GAP. The mean FEF 25-75%, which is typically considered to reflect small airway disease, was 93% in IPF patients, while it was significantly lower in COPD patients (29%). Impulse oscillometry measurements were consistent with spirometry parameters. IOS resistance and reactance values were significantly higher in COPD patients than in IPF patients. CONCLUSIONS IOS is advantageous in COPD and IPF patients who cannot exhale due to severe dyspnea, as it is easy to administer and reflects small airway resistance better. Diagnosis of small airway dysfunction may be beneficial in the management of patients with IPF and COPD.