LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Pleth Variability Index Guided Volume Optimisation in Major Gynaecologic Surgery.

Photo by papaioannou_kostas from unsplash

OBJECTIVE To compare conventional fluid management (CFM) with pleth variability index (PVI) guided goal-directed fluid management (GDFM) during elective total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH+BSO) operations. STUDY DESIGN Randomised… Click to show full abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare conventional fluid management (CFM) with pleth variability index (PVI) guided goal-directed fluid management (GDFM) during elective total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH+BSO) operations. STUDY DESIGN Randomised controlled trial. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, from February to July 2021. METHODOLOGY This trial included 78 patients aged 18-65 years with ASA I-III who would undergo elective TAH-BSO under general anaesthesia. Following randomisation with the closed envelope method, standard monitoring, and 250 ml crystalloid infusion during anaesthesia induction, maintenance fluid therapy was administered at 8-10 ml/Kg/hour to the control group and 2-3 ml/Kg/hour to the PVI group. If the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was ≤65 mmHg and/or the MAP was decreased by more than 20%, and the PVI was >13%, a 250 ml colloid bolus was given. When there was no response, a vasoactive agent was administered. Vital signs, laboratory findings, and postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS Age, weight, BMI, urine output, bleeding, hospital stay, comorbidities, intraoperative use of blood products, and complication rates were not significantly different between the PVI and CFM groups (p>0.05). The PVI group had shorter operational times and used less crystalloid than the control group (p=0.033 and p<0.001, respectively). The PVI group's postoperative base excess (BE) levels changed significantly less than the control group's (p<0.001). In both pre- and postoperative haemoglobin, haematocrit, urea, creatinine, electrolytes, and lactate measurements, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION PVI-GDFM is equally safe as CFM for intraoperative fluid management during elective complete abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy procedures. KEY WORDS Pleth variability index, Fluid management, Base excess.

Keywords: group; fluid management; pleth variability; variability index

Journal Title: Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.