Photo by moonshadowpress from unsplash
Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of national health survey data from Australian, English and United States (n = 4,056; n = 2,994; n = 2,943; respectively) adults aged ≥40 years. Participants were… Click to show full abstract
Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of national health survey data from Australian, English and United States (n = 4,056; n = 2,994; n = 2,943; respectively) adults aged ≥40 years. Participants were classified as recommended for therapy based on clinical characteristics denoting high risk and absolute CVD risk stratification according to each country’s guidelines [1–6]. Agreement in therapy recommendation assessed by Kappa statistic.
Keywords:
comparison cardiovascular;
disease primary;
prevention guidelines;
united states;
cardiovascular disease;
primary prevention
Journal Title: Artery Research
Year Published: 2020
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
Journal Title: Artery Research
Year Published: 2020
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!