LAUSR

DISCUSSION Regional Australia remains a district of workforce shortage for nephrology. Thus, it is imperative that patients who have the greatest need for nephrologist services are effectively identified upon referral. The aim of this study was to assess referrals to a regional nephrology service against Australian guidelines by assessing the patient’s renal function and the information contained in the referral document at the time of first consultation. We conducted a retrospective study of all referrals to a regional Australian nephrology service between 2013 and 2015. The 582 referrals that met the inclusion criteria were compared with Australian nephrology referral guidelines. Less than half of the referral documents (n = 253; 43.5%) described a clinical situation that met referral guidelines, typically due to insufficient pathology investigation. However, after consideration of renal functional test results performed at the initial consultation, an additional 82 cases met referral guidelines (n = 335; 57.6%). More than 40% of nephrology referrals to a regional Australian service did not meet Australian nephrology referral guidelines. This has implications for a regional nephrology service that is experiencing workforce pressures, in addition to the health system more broadly, and for patients. Many referrals contained insufficient information to allow differentiation of patients who would benefit most from nephrology care from patients who could be appropriately managed within primary care.