LAUSR

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe clinical instructors' (CIs) comments on the Canadian Physiotherapy Assessment of Clinical Performance (ACP) that reflect areas of strength and areas requiring improvement among internationally educated physical therapists (IEPTs) during supervised clinical internships in a bridging programme. Method: We reviewed the assessment records of 100 IEPTs' clinical performance during two internships each for three successive cohorts of learners in a Canadian bridging programme. We extracted the CIs' text from 385 comment sections of the ACP completed during these internships and analyzed them using qualitative content analysis. Results: The iterative deductive coding process resulted in 36 subcategories: 14 for areas of strength and 22 for areas requiring improvement. We merged the 36 subcategories to produce nine categories: four areas of strength (subjective assessment, treatment, patient confidentiality, and professionalism) and five areas for improvement (objective assessment, clinical reasoning, establishment of treatment goals, communication, confidence, and time management). We then grouped these categories into two broad themes: professional practice and professional conduct. Conclusions: The CIs commended the IEPTs for their clinical competence in subjective assessment, treatment, patient confidentiality, and professionalism. The areas requiring improvement typically required more complex clinical decision-making skills, which may have been challenging for these IEPTs to demonstrate as competently during a short internship.