BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cholesteatoma is an aggressive disease that may lead to hearing impairment. This study aimed to compare the utility of high-resolution CT and TSE-DWI fusion images with that… Click to show full abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cholesteatoma is an aggressive disease that may lead to hearing impairment. This study aimed to compare the utility of high-resolution CT and TSE-DWI fusion images with that of T2WI and TSE-DWI fusion images in the localization of middle ear cholesteatoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were retrospectively recruited. High-resolution CT, T2WI with fat suppression, and TSE-DWI scans were obtained, and image fusion was performed using a 3D reconstruction postprocessing workstation to form CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI fusion images. The quality of the 2 fused images was subjectively evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale with the horizontal semicircular canal transverse position as the reference. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and the diagnostic efficacies of CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI fusion images in localizing middle ear cholesteatoma were calculated. RESULTS: The overall quality of T2WI-DWI fusion images was slightly higher than that of CT-DWI fusion images (Pā<ā.001), and the semicircular canal was slightly less clear on T2WI-DWI than on CT-DWI (Pā<ā.001). No statistical difference was found in the diagnostic confidence between them. In the localization of middle ear cholesteatoma, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of T2WI-DWI fusion images and CT-DWI fusion images were equivalent for involvement of the attic, tympanic cavity, mastoid antrum, and mastoid process, with no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: T2WI-DWI fusion images could replace CT-DWI in the preoperative selection of surgical options for middle ear cholesteatoma.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.