LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Inappropriate Authorship and Kinship in Research Evaluation

Photo by impulsq from unsplash

To curb the issue of allocating the same credit to all co-authors of any multi-author paper, it has been proposed to give the greater credit share to the first author… Click to show full abstract

To curb the issue of allocating the same credit to all co-authors of any multi-author paper, it has been proposed to give the greater credit share to the first author and lesser shares to the co-authors, depending on their contribution and position in the byline.5 Moreover, Shen and Barabási6 developed an algorithm that attempts to quantify the credit share of co-authors. Consistent with this idea, a recent study of more than 12,000 articles in the biological and life sciences confirms that 1st authors declare more contributions (3.77) than last (3.03) and middle (1.80–2.50) co-authors.7 Also, it has been documented that middle authors of papers with numerous co-authors are less likely to become principal investigators unless they publish in journals with a high-impact factor.8

Keywords: authorship kinship; credit; kinship research; inappropriate authorship; research evaluation

Journal Title: Journal of Korean Medical Science
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.