Introduction Nanopore sequencing has been widely used in clinical metagenomic sequencing for pathogen detection with high portability and real-time sequencing. Oxford Nanopore Technologies has recently launched an adaptive sequencing function,… Click to show full abstract
Introduction Nanopore sequencing has been widely used in clinical metagenomic sequencing for pathogen detection with high portability and real-time sequencing. Oxford Nanopore Technologies has recently launched an adaptive sequencing function, which can enrich on-target reads through real-time alignment and eject uninteresting reads by reversing the voltage across the nanopore. Here we evaluated the utility of adaptive sequencing in clinical pathogen detection. Methods Nanopore adaptive sequencing and standard sequencing was performed on a same flow cell with a bronchoalveolar lavage fluid sample from a patient with Chlamydia psittacosis infection, and was compared with the previous mNGS results. Results Nanopore adaptive sequencing identified 648 on-target stop receiving reads with the longest median read length(688bp), which account for 72.4% of all Chlamydia psittaci reads and 0.03% of total reads in enriched group. The read proportion matched to C. psittaci in the stop receiving group was 99.85%, which was much higher than that of the unblock (<0.01%) and fail to adapt (0.02%) groups. Nanopore adaptive sequencing generated similar data yield of C. psittaci compared with standard nanopore sequencing. The proportion of C. psittaci reads in adaptive sequencing is close to that of standard nanopore sequencing and mNGS, but generated lower genome coverage than mNGS. Discussion Nanopore adaptive sequencing can effectively identify target C. psittaci reads in real-time, but how to increase the targeted data of pathogens still needs to be further evaluated.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.