Background The identification of uropathogens (UPBs) and urinary tract colonizing bacteria (UCB) conduces to guide the antimicrobial therapy to reduce resistant bacterial strains and study urinary microbiota. This study established… Click to show full abstract
Background The identification of uropathogens (UPBs) and urinary tract colonizing bacteria (UCB) conduces to guide the antimicrobial therapy to reduce resistant bacterial strains and study urinary microbiota. This study established a nomogram based on the nanopore-targeted sequencing (NTS) and other infectious risk factors to distinguish UPB from UCB. Methods Basic information, medical history, and multiple urine test results were continuously collected and analyzed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the independent predictors and construct nomogram. Receiver operating characteristics, area under the curve, decision curve analysis, and calibration curves were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. Results In this study, the UPB detected by NTS accounted for 74.1% (401/541) of all urinary tract microorganisms. The distribution of ln(reads) between UPB and UCB groups showed significant difference (OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.246–1.551, p < 0.001); the reads number in NTS reports could be used for the preliminary determination of UPB (AUC=0.668) with corresponding cutoff values being 7.042. Regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors and construct a nomogram, with variables ranked by importance as ln(reads) and the number of microbial species in the urinary tract of NTS, urine culture, age, urological neoplasms, nitrite, and glycosuria. The calibration curve showed an agreement between the predicted and observed probabilities of the nomogram. The decision curve analysis represented that the nomogram would benefit clinical interventions. The performance of nomogram with ln(reads) (AUC = 0.767; 95% CI, 0.726–0.807) was significantly better (Z = 2.304, p-value = 0.021) than that without ln(reads) (AUC = 0.727; 95% CI, 0.681–0.772). The rate of UPB identification of nomogram was significantly higher than that of ln(reads) only (χ2 = 7.36, p-value = 0.009). Conclusions NTS is conducive to distinguish uropathogens from colonizing bacteria, and the nomogram based on NTS and multiple independent predictors has better prediction performance of uropathogens.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.