LAUSR

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential to detect fungal keratitis using in vivo confocal microscopy images, but its clinical value remains unclarified. A major limitation of its clinical utility is the lack of explainability and interpretability. Methods: An explainable AI (XAI) system based on Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) and Guided Grad-CAM was established. In this randomized controlled trial, nine ophthalmologists (three expert ophthalmologists, three competent ophthalmologists, and three novice ophthalmologists) read images in each of the conditions: unassisted, AI-assisted, or XAI-assisted. In unassisted condition, only the original IVCM images were shown to the readers. AI assistance comprised a histogram of model prediction probability. For XAI assistance, explanatory maps were additionally shown. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated against an adjudicated reference standard. Moreover, the time spent was measured. Results: Both forms of algorithmic assistance increased the accuracy and sensitivity of competent and novice ophthalmologists significantly without reducing specificity. The improvement was more pronounced in XAI-assisted condition than that in AI-assisted condition. Time spent with XAI assistance was not significantly different from that without assistance. Conclusion: AI has shown great promise in improving the accuracy of ophthalmologists. The inexperienced readers are more likely to benefit from the XAI system. With better interpretability and explainability, XAI-assistance can boost ophthalmologist performance beyond what is achievable by the reader alone or with black-box AI assistance.