LAUSR

Objective Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation of connective tissue disease (CTD) that manifests as several subtypes with significant differences in prognosis. It is necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone (PFD) combined with immunosuppressant (IS) in the treatment of CTD-ILD. Methods A total of 111 patients with CTD-ILD were enrolled, including those with systemic sclerosis (SSc), inflammatory myopathy (IIM), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and other CTDs (such as systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjogren's syndrome, and undifferentiated CTD). After evaluation of the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), pulmonary function (PF), and basic disease activity, patients either were or were not prescribed PFD and were followed up regularly for 24 weeks. Results After 24 weeks of treatment, predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) in the SSc-PFD group had improved by 6.60%, whereas this value was 0.55% in patients with SSc-no-PFD. The elevation in FVC% was also significant in IIM-PFD over the IIM-no-PFD controls (7.50 vs. 1.00%). The predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCo%) of RA-PFD was enhanced by 7.40%, whereas that of RA-no-PFD decreased by 5.50%. When performing a subtype analysis of HRCT images, the change in FVC% among patients with SSc with a tendency toward usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) was higher in those given PFD (SSc-PFD-UIP) than the no-PFD group (8.05 vs. −3.20%). However, in IIM patients with a non-UIP tendency, PFD displayed better therapeutic effects than the control (10.50 vs. 1.00%). DLCo% improved significantly in patients with the PFD-treated RA-non-UIP subtype compared with the patients with no-PFD (10.40 vs. −4.45%). Dichotomizing the patients around a baseline FVC% or DLCo% value of 70%, the PFD arm had a more improved FVC% than the no-PFD arm within the high-baseline-FVC% subgroups of patients with SSc and IIM (6.60 vs. 0.10%, 6.30 vs. 1.10%). In patients with RA-PFD, DLCo% showed a significant increase in the subgroup with low baseline DLCo% compared to that in patients with RA-no-PFD (7.40 vs. −6.60%). Conclusion The response of PF to PFD varied between CTD-ILD subsets. Patients with SSc and IIM showed obvious improvements in FVC%, especially patients with SSc-UIP and IIM-non-UIP. In RA, the subsets of patients with non-UIP and a lower baseline DLCo% most benefited from PFD.