LAUSR

Purpose To investigate whether stereoscopic vs. monoscopic viewing condition influences the evaluation of optic disc photographs for morphologic features and glaucoma likelihood in a general ophthalmologist population from multicenters on a cloud-based platform. Methods A cross-sectional study of 519 pairs of stereoscopic and monoscopic photographs of optic discs with adequate quality were selected and presented using a cloud-based platform. A total of 21 general ophthalmologists from 14 centers assessed 15 morphologic features based on 5R's rules and estimated glaucoma likelihood for each assigned photograph. There were 93 pairs of stereoscopic and monoscopic photographs evaluated by a panel of glaucoma specialists and set as ground truth. The main outcome measures were the agreement between estimates and ground truth and the inter-grader agreements. Results There were good agreements between ground truth and both monoscopic and stereoscopic estimates (stereo κ 0.532 and mono κ 0.494). There was also a substantial intra-grader agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic evaluation of glaucoma likelihood (κ 0.636). In eyes with probable glaucoma, the accuracy of the stereo method was greater than that of the mono method (stereo 0.238 vs. mono 0.118) When compared with ground truth, stereoscopic photographs had a better agreement for disc size (stereo κ 0.447 vs. mono κ 0.183), disc color (stereo κ 0.612 vs. mono κ 0.549), neuroretinal rim shape (stereo κ 0.356 vs. mono κ 0.274) on the whole. The stereoscopic method also had a better inter-grade agreement for disc size, disc color, neuroretinal rim shape, and glaucoma likelihood (stereo κ 0.402 vs. mono κ 0.359) on the whole. Conclusions In the evaluation of optic disc photographs for morphologic features and glaucoma likelihood, the stereoscopic method showed superiority compared to the monoscopic method for general ophthalmologists. The stereoscopic method is more likely to identify glaucomatous eyes which need medical intervention.