The firing properties of the motor units are usually affected by the motor task. However, it has not been clarified whether the firing properties of the motor units of a… Click to show full abstract
The firing properties of the motor units are usually affected by the motor task. However, it has not been clarified whether the firing properties of the motor units of a specific muscle are different between postural and voluntary tasks. Therefore, this study investigated whether the recruitment and rate coding of the motor units differ between these two motor tasks. Thirteen healthy volunteers performed trapezoidal muscle contraction with a target value of 15% maximum electromyography (EMG) activity by voluntary left knee extension in the sitting position (voluntary task) and postural maintenance in the semi-squatting position (postural task) with a knee flexion angle of 30°. We obtained four channels of surface EMG activity during each task from left vastus lateralis muscle. We extracted the firing properties of individual motor units using the EMG decomposition algorithm. The recruitment threshold and motor unit action potential amplitude were significantly lower in the postural task than in the voluntary task, and conversely, the mean firing rate was significantly higher. These results were explained by the preferential recruitment of motor units with higher recruitment threshold and amplitude in the voluntary task, while motor units with lower recruitment threshold and higher firing rate were preferentially recruited in the postural task. Preferential activation of fatigue-resistant motor units in the postural task is a reasonable strategy as it allows for sustained postural maintenance. We provide the first evidence that motor unit firing properties are clearly different between postural and voluntary tasks, even at the same muscle activity level.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.