LAUSR

Purpose To compare the value of contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and non-contrast-enhanced CT (NCECT) radiomics models in differentiating tuberculosis (TB) from non-tuberculous infectious lesions (NTIL) presenting as solid pulmonary nodules or masses, and develop a combine radiomics model (RM). Materials and methods This study was a retrospective analysis of 101 lesions in 95 patients, including 49 lesions (from 45 patients) in the TB group and 52 lesions (from 50 patients) in the NTIL group. Lesions were randomly divided into training and test sets in the ratio of 7:3. Conventional imaging features were used to construct a conventional imaging model (IM). Radiomics features screening and NCECT or CECT RM construction were carried out by correlation analysis and gradient boosting decision tree, and logistic regression. Finally, conventional IM, NCECT RM, and CECT RM were used for combine RM construction. Additionally, we recruited three radiologists for independent diagnosis. The differential diagnostic performance of each model was assessed using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs). Results The CECT RM (training AUC, 0.874; test AUC, 0.796) outperformed the conventional IM (training AUC, 0.792; test AUC, 0.708), the NCECT RM (training AUC, 0.835; test AUC, 0.704), and three radiologists. The diagnostic efficacy of the combine RM (training AUC, 0.922; test AUC, 0.833) was best in the training and test sets. Conclusions The diagnostic efficacy of the CECT RM was superior to that of the NCECT RM in identifying TB from NTIL presenting as solid pulmonary nodules or masses. The combine RM had the best performance and may outperform expert radiologists.