LAUSR

Introduction Early exposure to practical skills in surgical training is essential in order to master technically demanding procedures such as the design and execution of local skin flaps. Changes in working patterns, increasing subspecializations, centralization of surgical services, and the publication of surgeon-specific outcomes have all made hands-on-training in a clinical environment increasingly difficult to achieve for the junior surgeon. This has been further compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. This necessitates alternative methods of surgical skills training. To date, there are no standardized or ideal simulation models for local skin flap teaching. Aim This systematic review aims to summarize and evaluate local skin flap simulation and teaching models published in the literature. Materials and Methods A systematic review protocol was developed and undertaken in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Key search terms encompassed both “local skin flaps” and “models” or “surgical simulation”. These were combined using Boolean logic and used to search Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were collected and screened according to the inclusion criteria. The final included articles were graded for their level of evidence and recommendation based on a modified educational Oxford Center for evidence-based medicine classification system and assessed according to the CRe-DEPTH tool for articles describing training interventions in healthcare professionals. Results A total of 549 articles were identified, resulting in the inclusion of 16 full-text papers. Four articles used 3D simulators for local flap teaching and training, while two articles described computer simulation as an alternative method for local flap practicing. Four models were silicone based, while gelatin, Allevyn dressings, foam rubber, and ethylene-vinyl acetate-based local flap simulators were also described. Animal models such as pigs head, porcine skin, chicken leg, and rat, as well as a training model based on fresh human skin excised from body-contouring procedures, were described. Each simulation and teaching method was assessed by a group of candidates via a questionnaire or evaluation survey grading system. Most of the studies were graded as level of evidence 3 or 4. Conclusion Many methods of simulation for the design and execution of local skin flaps have been described. However, most of these have been assessed only in small cohort numbers, and, therefore, larger candidate sizes and a standardized method for assessment are required. Moreover, some proposed simulators, although promising, are in a very preliminary stage of development. Further development and evaluation of promising high-fidelity models is required in order to improve training in such a complex area of surgery.