Simple Summary Magnetic resonance imaging is commonly used in pre-treatment prostate cancer diagnostics. The assessment includes a five-stage scale classification called Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), routinely used to… Click to show full abstract
Simple Summary Magnetic resonance imaging is commonly used in pre-treatment prostate cancer diagnostics. The assessment includes a five-stage scale classification called Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), routinely used to describe the probability of finding a clinically significant cancer. Less is known about the association of PI-RADS score with patients’ prognosis. Our retrospective study aimed to assess the association between pre-treatment PI-RADS score and risk of developing metastases, based on a cohort of 152 patients treated with ultra-hypofractionated CyberKnife radiotherapy for low or intermediate-risk group prostate cancer. PI-RADS score and the size of the target lesion proved to be significantly associated with the risk of developing metastases, suggesting that the introduction of PI-RADS score to initial risk assessment could improve the patient-tailored management of prostate cancer. Abstract Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) has been widely implemented as a diagnostic tool for significant prostate cancer (PCa); less is known about its prognostic value, especially in the setting of primary radiotherapy. We aimed to analyze the association between PI-RADS v. 2.1 classification and risk of metastases, based on a group of 152 patients treated with ultra-hypofractionated stereotactic CyberKnife radiotherapy for localized low or intermediate risk-group prostate cancer. We found that all distant failures (n = 5) occurred in patients diagnosed with a PI-RADS score of 5, and axial measurements of the target lesion were associated with the risk of developing metastases (p < 0.001). The best risk stratification model (based on a combination of greatest dimension, the product of multiplication of PI-RADS target lesion axial measurements, and age) achieved a c-index of 0.903 (bootstrap-validated bias-corrected 95% CI: 0.848–0.901). This creates a hypothesis that PI-RADS 5 and the size of the target lesion are important prognostic factors in early-stage PCa patients and should be considered as an adverse prognostic measure for patients undergoing early treatment such as radiation or focal therapy.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.