Simple Summary Tumor burden score (TBS) has been recently introduced to assess the tumor burden in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its prognostic role in patients with early-stage HCC is unclear.… Click to show full abstract
Simple Summary Tumor burden score (TBS) has been recently introduced to assess the tumor burden in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its prognostic role in patients with early-stage HCC is unclear. We confirm that TBS is an independent prognostic predictor in HCC patients within the Milan criteria undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). TACE may be an effective treatment alternative for these patients. Among patients with low TBS, RFA should be considered the priority treatment modality. Abstract Tumor burden score (TBS), estimated by the diameter and number of tumor nodules, was recently proposed to assess the tumor burden in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of TBS on HCC patients within the Milan criteria undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). A total of 883 patients undergoing RFA and TACE were included. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine independent prognostic predictors in different patient cohorts. The TACE group had significantly higher TBS compared with the RFA group. The RFA group had better long-term survival than the TACE group in patients within the Milan criteria in univariate survival analysis. In the Cox model, serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) > 20 ng/mL, performance status 1–2, medium and high TBS, albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) grade 2 and grade 3 were independent predictors linked with mortality (all p < 0.001). Overall, TACE was not an independent predictor; among patients with low TBS, TACE was independently associated with decreased survival compared with RFA (p = 0.034). Conclusions: TBS is a feasible prognostic marker for HCC patients within the Milan criteria. TACE may be an effective treatment alternative for these patients. Among patients with low TBS, RFA should be considered the priority treatment modality.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.