LAUSR

Simple Summary Over the last decade radiology interventions for tumor ablation have steadily increased and new procedures of interventional Oncology (IO) have been developed. Minimal residual disease (MRD) management and its quantification has a critical role to assess the efficacy or failure of the treatment adopted.The assessment of the MRD depends by multiple and repetitive measurements performed through a no invasive procedure like as Liquid biopsy (LB). LB is a rapidly evolving technology with potentially relevant consequences in the management of patients with cancer. Despite its high potential, the LB approach cannot give spatial information and still lacks of standardization and required specificity and sensitivity to be extensively implemented in the routine clinical practice. The review is aimed at investigating how LB can monitor the effects of locoregional treatment highliting the potential synergies between interventional techniques and LB to improve cancer patient’ management. The review suggests combining Interventional techniques and LB technology could improve LB overcoming its sensitivity limitations. Furthermore, LB techniques may enhance the outcomes of minimally invasive loco-regional treatments not only via ongoing periodic MRD monitoring of a patient during and subsequent to IO procedures. Abstract Although the role of liquid biopsy (LB) to measure minimal residual disease (MRD) in the treatment of epithelial cancer is well known, the biology of the change in the availability of circulating biomarkers arising throughout treatments such as radiotherapy and interventional radio-oncology is less explained. Deep knowledge of how therapeutic effects can influence the biology of the release mechanism at the base of the biomarkers available in the bloodstream is needed for selecting the appropriate treatment-induced tumor circulating biomarker. Combining existing progress in the LB and interventional oncology (IO) fields, a proof of concept is provided, discussing the advantages of the traditional risk assessment of relapsing lesions, limitations, and the timing of detection of the circulating biomarker. The current review aims to help both interventional radiologists and interventional radiation oncologists evaluate the possibility of drawing a tailor-made board of blood-based surveillance markers to reveal subclinical diseases and avoid overtreatment.