Simple Summary In the present work we investigated the clinical utility of Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide (Al[18F]F-OC) in comparison to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE in patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumours. Our aim was to verify the… Click to show full abstract
Simple Summary In the present work we investigated the clinical utility of Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide (Al[18F]F-OC) in comparison to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE in patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumours. Our aim was to verify the recently published, promising results for Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide in the Latin-American population. Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide provided excellent image quality, detected NET lesions with high sensitivity and represents a highly promising, clinical alternative to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE. Abstract PET imaging of neuroendocrine tumours (NET) is well established for staging and therapy follow-up. The short half-life, increasing costs, and regulatory issues significantly limit the availability of approved imaging agents, such as [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE. Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide provides a similar biodistribution and tumour uptake, can be produced on a large scale and may improve access to precision imaging. Here we prospectively compared the clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE and Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide in the Latin-American population. Our results showed that in patients with stage IV NETs [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE presents higher physiological uptake than Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide in the liver, hypophysis, salivary glands, adrenal glands (all p < 0.001), pancreatic uncinated process, kidneys, and small intestine (all p < 0.05). Nevertheless, despite the lower background uptake of Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide, comparative analysis of tumour-to-liver (TLR) and tumour-to-spleen (TSR) showed no statistically significant difference for lesions in the liver, bone, lymph nodes, and other tissues. Only three discordant lesions in highly-metastases livers were detected by [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE but not by Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide and only one discordant lesion was detected by Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide but not by [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE. Non-inferiority analysis showed that Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide is comparable to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE. Hence, our results demonstrate that Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide provided excellent image quality, visualized NET lesions with high sensitivity and represents a highly promising, clinical alternative to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.