LAUSR

Simple Summary The solution structure of the N-terminal domain of Protein Regulator of Cytokinesis 1 (PRC1) was determined, and compared with the previously published crystal structure, significant differences were found. Extensive analyses were carried out to find the true reason for the differences between the solution and crystal structures, we discovered that this might be related to the conformation of residue M1, which is buried in the protein core of the solution structure, while situated outside of the hydrophobic core in the crystal structure. In this study, we have carried out a series of examinations using various methods and confirmed that the N terminal conformation is the key point in better describing the structure of PRC1 dimerization domain under solution conditions. Abstract Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) are essential for the accurate division of a cell into two daughter cells. These proteins target specific microtubules to be incorporated into the spindle midzone, which comprises a special array of microtubules that initiate cytokinesis during anaphase. A representative member of the MAPs is Protein Regulator of Cytokinesis 1 (PRC1), which self-multimerizes to cross-link microtubules, the malfunction of which might result in cancerous cells. The importance of PRC1 multimerization makes it a popular target for structural studies. The available crystal structure of PRC1 has low resolution (>3 Å) and accuracy, limiting a better understanding of the structure-related functions of PRC1. Therefore, we used NMR spectroscopy to better determine the structure of the dimerization domain of PRC1. The NMR structure shows that the PRC1 N terminus is crucial to the overall structure integrity, but the crystal structure bespeaks otherwise. We systematically addressed the role of the N terminus by generating a series of mutants in which N-terminal residues methionine (Met1) and arginine (Arg2) were either deleted, extended or substituted with other rationally selected amino acids. Each mutant was subsequently analyzed by NMR spectroscopy or fluorescence thermal shift assays for its structural or thermal stability; we found that N-terminal perturbations indeed affected the overall protein structure and that the solution structure better reflects the conformation of PRC1 under solution conditions. These results reveal that the structure of PRC1 is governed by its N terminus through hydrophobic interactions with other core residues, such hitherto unidentified N-terminal conformations might shed light on the structure–function relationships of PRC1 or other proteins. Therefore, our study is of major importance in terms of identifying a novel structural feature and can further the progress of protein folding and protein engineering.