LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

C–H…X (X = F, Cl, Br, I) Versus π-Stacking in the Crystal Packing of Compounds Containing the {M(tpy)X3} Motif

Photo by samaustin from unsplash

Analysis of the data in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) for compounds containing an {M(tpy)X3} motif (tpy = 2,2’:6’,2”-terpyridine, M = any metal, X = F, Cl, Br, I) reveals… Click to show full abstract

Analysis of the data in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) for compounds containing an {M(tpy)X3} motif (tpy = 2,2’:6’,2”-terpyridine, M = any metal, X = F, Cl, Br, I) reveals 17 isostructural mononuclear [M(tpy)X3] compounds crystallizing without lattice solvent; both face-to-face π-stacking of pyridine rings and C–H3/H3’…X hydrogen bonding appear to be equally important. Regardless of coordination number (CN = 6, 7 or 8) and nuclearity (mono- or dinuclear), a recurring packing feature in other compounds containing an {M(tpy)X3} unit is the presence of bifurcated Cl…H3/H3’ interactions, complemented in some cases by Cl…H5’/H3” interactions, consistent with the acidic H3, H3’, H5’, and H3” atoms of a coordinated tpy ligand. Octahedral [M(tpy)F3] complexes crystallize as hydrates with strong F…H–OH hydrogen bonding dominating the crystal packing.

Keywords: crystal packing; tpy motif; compounds containing; containing tpy; tpy; versus stacking

Journal Title: Crystals
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.