LAUSR

We aimed to compare dedicated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) followed by high-pitch scanning and triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography (TRO-CTA) in terms of radiation dose, contrast media (CM) use, and image quality. Patients with acute chest pain were retrospectively enrolled and assigned to group A (n = 55; scanned with dedicated CCTA followed by high-pitch scanning) or group B (n = 45; with TRO-CTA). Patient characteristics, radiation dose, CM use, and quantitative parameters (CT value, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and image quality score) of pulmonary arteries (PAs), thoracic aortae (TAs), and coronary arteries (CAs) were compared. The total effective dose was significantly lower in group A (6.25 ± 2.94 mSv) than B (8.93 ± 4.08 mSv; p < 0.001). CM volume was significantly lower in group A (75.7 ± 8.9 mL) than B (95.0 ± 0 mL; p < 0.001). PA and TA image quality were significantly better in group B, whereas that of CA was significantly better in group A. Qualitative image scores of PA and TA scans rated by radiologists were similar, whereas that of CA scans was significantly higher in group A than B (p < 0.001). Dedicated CCTA followed by high-pitch scanning demonstrated lower radiation doses and CM volume without debasing qualities of PA, TA, and CA scans than did TRO-CTA.