Task-nuisance decomposition describes why the information bottleneck loss I(z;x)−βI(z;y) is a suitable objective for supervised learning. The true category y is predicted for input x using latent variables z. When… Click to show full abstract
Task-nuisance decomposition describes why the information bottleneck loss I(z;x)−βI(z;y) is a suitable objective for supervised learning. The true category y is predicted for input x using latent variables z. When n is a nuisance independent from y, I(z;n) can be decreased by reducing I(z;x) since the latter upper bounds the former. We extend this framework by demonstrating that conditional mutual information I(z;x|y) provides an alternative upper bound for I(z;n). This bound is applicable even if z is not a sufficient representation of x, that is, I(z;y)≠I(x;y). We used mutual information neural estimation (MINE) to estimate I(z;x|y). Experiments demonstrated that I(z;x|y) is smaller than I(z;x) for layers closer to the input, matching the claim that the former is a tighter bound than the latter. Because of this difference, the information plane differs when I(z;x|y) is used instead of I(z;x).
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.