Mitochondrial genomes of four elapid snakes (three marine species [Emydocephalus ijimae, Hydrophis ornatus, and Hydrophis melanocephalus], and one terrestrial species [Sinomicrurus japonicus]) were completely sequenced by a combination of Sanger… Click to show full abstract
Mitochondrial genomes of four elapid snakes (three marine species [Emydocephalus ijimae, Hydrophis ornatus, and Hydrophis melanocephalus], and one terrestrial species [Sinomicrurus japonicus]) were completely sequenced by a combination of Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing and Nanopore sequencing. Nanopore sequencing was especially effective in accurately reading through long tandem repeats in these genomes. This led us to show that major noncoding regions in the mitochondrial genomes of those three sea snakes contain considerably long tandem duplications, unlike the mitochondrial genomes previously reported for same and other sea snake species. We also found a transposition of the light-strand replication origin within a tRNA gene cluster for the three sea snakes. This change can be explained by the Tandem Duplication—Random Loss model, which was further supported by remnant intervening sequences between tRNA genes. Mitochondrial genomes of true snakes (Alethinophidia) have been shown to contain duplicate major noncoding regions, each of which includes the control region necessary for regulating the heavy-strand replication and transcription from both strands. However, the control region completely disappeared from one of the two major noncoding regions for two Hydrophis sea snakes, posing evolutionary questions on the roles of duplicate control regions in snake mitochondrial genomes. The timing and molecular mechanisms for these changes are discussed based on the elapid phylogeny.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.