LAUSR

Simple Summary There is growing public and legislative pressure to reduce the use of pesticides in crop production. It is thought that the gray field slug is not uniformly distributed in arable fields, but that patches of higher slug densities occur, interspersed within areas of lower slug numbers. Targeting molluscicide applications only at these patches, leaving other areas untreated, would substantially reduce the amount of molluscicide used but relies on patches being a feature of slug populations in all susceptible crops, and always occurring in the same places during the periods slug control is needed. This study investigated these requirements in 22 commercial arable field crops from different regions of the UK, and in three different years. Despite a variable proportion of slug populations being found below the soil surface (where they could not be assessed) on different sampling dates, existence of higher density patches were confirmed in all fields, although it was noted that, when too few slugs were active on the soil surface, they could not be reliably detected. When they were detected, they occurred in the same locations in each field. The potential for using these patches in more sustainable slug control approaches is discussed. Abstract Exploitation of heterogenous distributions of Deroceras reticulatum, in arable fields by targeting molluscicide applications toward areas with higher slug densities, relies on these patches displaying sufficient spatio-temporal stability. Regular sampling of slug activity/distribution was undertaken using 1 ha rectangular grids of 100 refuge traps established in 22 commercial arable field crops. Activity varied significantly between the three years of the study, and the degree of aggregation (Taylor’s Power Law) was higher in fields with higher mean trap catches. Hot spot analysis detected statistically significant spatial clusters in all fields, and in 162 of the 167 individual assessment visits. The five assessment visits in which no clusters were detected coincided with low slug activity (≤0.07 per trap). Generalized Linear Models showed significant spatial stability of patches in 11 fields, with non-significant fields also characterized by low slug activity (≤1.2 per trap). Mantel’s permutation tests revealed a high degree of correlation between location of individual patches between sampling dates. It was concluded that patches of higher slug density were spatio-temporally stable, but detection using surface refuge traps (which rely on slug activity on the soil surface) was less reliable when adverse environmental conditions resulted in slugs retreating into the upper soil horizons.