Simple Summary Honey bee colonies are lost mostly during the winter, and loss rates (the proportion of dead colonies) may fluctuate highly between years. We investigated whether foraging activity—measured as… Click to show full abstract
Simple Summary Honey bee colonies are lost mostly during the winter, and loss rates (the proportion of dead colonies) may fluctuate highly between years. We investigated whether foraging activity—measured as the start of honey flow in spring and its magnitude in summer—influence loss rates in the following winter. Estimates of loss rates were gained from two surveys, in autumn and in winter, while foraging was investigated with automated hive scales during the foraging season in March–July. The surveys showed that high loss rates in autumn were followed by high loss rates in winter, and that high winter loss rates were followed by low loss rates in the following autumn. The fluctuations were influenced by the start of foraging in spring, where an early start in March resulted in high loss rates in autumn and winter, whereas a high intake of nectar in May–June led to lower loss rates. Together, the surveys and the foraging patterns suggest that colony loss rates in winter are influenced by the preceding one and a half years. Abstract Winter loss rates of honey bee colonies may fluctuate highly between years in temperate climates. The present study combined survey data of autumn and winter loss rates in Germany (2012–2021) with estimates of honey flow—assessed with automated hive scales as the start of honey flow in spring and its magnitude in summer—with the aim of understanding annual fluctuations in loss rates. Autumn colony loss rates were positively and significantly correlated with winter loss rates, whereas winter loss rates were inversely related to loss rates in autumn of the following year. An early start of net honey flow in spring predicted high loss rates in both autumn and winter, whereas high cumulative honey flow led to lower loss rates. The start of net honey flow was related to temperature sums in March. Combined, the results implied that the winter loss rate in one year was influenced by the loss rate of the preceding winter and shaped by honey flow dynamics during the following year. Hence, the rate of colony loss in winter can be viewed as a cumulative death process affected by the preceding one and a half years.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.