Simple Summary After resistance is first detected, continued resistance monitoring to describe the magnitude and extent of the resistance can inform pest management decisions on how to effectively manage the… Click to show full abstract
Simple Summary After resistance is first detected, continued resistance monitoring to describe the magnitude and extent of the resistance can inform pest management decisions on how to effectively manage the resistant populations. We collected Helicoverpa zea larvae from various plant hosts across the southeastern USA, and compared their survival to susceptible populations on a diet overlaid with the Bt toxins Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab2 for resistance estimates. Surprisingly, 62.5% of the tested populations were resistant to Cry2Ab, whereas only 37.5% of them were resistant to Cry1Ac. This contrasts with estimates in both the mid-southern and southeastern USA, where Cry1Ac, Cry1A.105, and Cry2Ab2 resistance increased over time and was found in a majority of populations. Both Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab resistance ratios were variable, but Cry2Ab resistance ratios were significantly higher than Cry1Ac resistance ratios in most of the tested populations. This indicates that cotton expressing Cry proteins in the southeastern USA was at variable risk for damage, in contrast to previous findings of increased damage in Cry-expressing cotton over time in this region. Abstract After resistance is first detected, continued resistance monitoring can inform decisions on how to effectively manage resistant populations. We monitored for resistance to Cry1Ac (2018 and 2019) and Cry2Ab2 (2019) from southeastern USA populations of Helicoverpa zea. We collected larvae from various plant hosts, sib-mated the adults, and tested neonates using diet-overlay bioassays and compared them to susceptible populations for resistance estimates. We also compared LC50 values with larval survival, weight and larval inhibition at the highest dose tested using regression, and found that LC50 values were negatively correlated with survival for both proteins. Finally, we compared resistance rations between Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab2 during 2019. Some populations were resistant to Cry1Ac, and most were resistant to CryAb2; Cry1Ac resistance ratios were lower than Cry2Ab2 during 2019. Survival was positively correlated with larval weight inhibition for Cry2Ab. This contrasts with other studies in both the mid-southern and southeastern USA, where resistance to Cry1Ac, Cry1A.105, and Cry2Ab2 increased over time and was found in a majority of populations. This indicates that cotton expressing Cry proteins in the southeastern USA was at variable risk for damage in this region.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.