LAUSR

Maritime security is currently a buzzword in international relations. The popularity of the term reflects an emerging consensus across the international community recognizing increasing challenges to world oceans and helps to rally support for serious efforts to cope with these challenges. However, the term is highly contested with regard to its conceptual meaning and empirical implications. The discipline of security studies provides a critical perspective revealing the state-centered ontology embedded in many of the discussions of maritime security. The complicated and intertwining nature of maritime threats in today’s world oceans demands a systematic analytical framework to comprehend and address them, a framework that moves beyond statist ontology, military means, and zero-sum mentality to a people-centered, diversified toolkit and positive-sum mentality and opens space for a common, cooperative, and comprehensive security agenda. The evolving discourse on human security and sustainable development sheds light on a possible path to approach such an agenda in an effective and sustainable manner. It has also enlightened the mandates of major international institutions and a lot of states practices in the pursuit of maritime security. Against this background, this article aims to explore the conception of maritime security and provide an analytical framework for analyzing and guiding maritime security practices and explores a feasible path towards realizing sustainable maritime security that can meet the diversified challenges emerging in global maritime space today. To this end, the article draws on the discipline of security studies over the past few decades so as to structure a rigorous analytical tool for engaging maritime security as a theoretical concept and a set of policy objectives. Applying this framework to state practices, this article discusses the case of China, examining, on the one hand, China’s understanding of maritime security and related policy practices and, on the other hand, exploring the value of the proposed policy framework as serving the foundation for bridging disagreements, forging consensus, and coordinating policy actions in the pursuit of sustained security and development in the maritime domain.