LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Fracture resistance of simulated immature maxillary anterior teeth restored with various canal filling materials, with micro-posts or with a fiber post.

Photo from wikipedia

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the fracture resistance of immature anterior teeth restored with different biomaterials. After preparation of bovine incisors to simulate immature permanent… Click to show full abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the fracture resistance of immature anterior teeth restored with different biomaterials. After preparation of bovine incisors to simulate immature permanent teeth, 98 specimens were assigned into seven groups as follows: G1 -negative control group; G2 -apexification with hydraulic calcium silicate cement in the whole root; G3 -apexification and gutta percha; G4 -apexification and fiber post; G5 -apexification with micro-posts; G6 -apexification with composite; and G7 -revascularization. Both the fracture resistance and the location where the fracture occurred were recorded. Group 4 with a fiber post increased fracture resistance value compared to control (p<0.05). The different tested biomaterials did not influence the location where the fractures occurred among the seven groups (χ21=1.760, p=0.1846).

Keywords: fiber post; fracture; fracture resistance; apexification; anterior teeth

Journal Title: Dental materials journal
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.