LAUSR

Background Direct Cortical Stimulation (DCS) represents the gold standard for mapping of eloquent brain cortex. However, DCS is an invasive and time-consuming procedure. fMRI has become a useful tool to delineate motor and sensory eloquent cortex from the areas of planned neurosurgical resection. In our study, we will be studying the reliability of preoperative imaging when compared with the intraoperative DCS. Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of fMRI by comparing it with DCS. Methods and Materials Thirty patients with eloquent cortex lesions were admitted. Preoperative fMRI sequences were loaded into a neuro-navigational system. Intraoperative motor mapping was done by DCS. The location of all cortical stimulated points was correlated with the cortical functional structures. Based on it, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of fMRI was calculated. Preoperative and postoperative Karnofsky score and MRC grading was then noted. Results Concordance between fMRI and DCS was noted in 26 cases. Overall mean sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of fMRI as compared to DCS was 95%, 92.48%, 85.56%, and 96.08%, respectively. Preoperative and Postoperative Karnofsky score stayed same in most of the cases [25/30]. Conclusions DCS remains the gold standard for mapping eloquent cortex in-spite of its invasiveness, side effects such as seizures and cost concerns. Although fMRI cannot replace DCS, it can guide and increase the efficacy in resection, select high-risk patients for intraoperative monitoring, help in preoperative stratification of risk counseling and preservation of neurological status in eloquent brain lesions.