Background and Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a procedure of choice for diagnostic evaluation of endoluminal and periluminal lesions. Tissue sample can be obtained by EUS-FNA cytology… Click to show full abstract
Background and Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a procedure of choice for diagnostic evaluation of endoluminal and periluminal lesions. Tissue sample can be obtained by EUS-FNA cytology or cellblock (CB). The aim of the present study is to compare diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA CB and/or cytology in the absence of on-site pathologist following a protocol-based EUS-FNA approach in solid lesions. Methods: Subjects who underwent EUS FNA at our center were included in this 2-year retrospective study. The etiological, clinical, and investigation details were recorded on uniform structured data forms. Superiority of the yield was calculated by McNemar’s test for P value. Results: Pancreatic masses were the most common indications (34%), followed by nodes (29%) in 114 EUS-FNA solid lesions. The diagnostic yield for EUS-FNA cytology was 68%, CB was 77%, and combined was 81%. There was no statistical significance in the yield between cytology and CB. CB was superior in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, lymphoma, stromal tumors, and liver mass evaluations. Conclusions: EUS-FNA needles provide good specimen for CB, and combination of CB with cytology increases the yield. CB is preferred over cytology in selected patients.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.