LAUSR

Purpose: The aim of this study was to elucidate the type of low vision devices (LVDs) prescribed for patients with cone dystrophy, cone–rod dystrophy, and rod–cone dystrophy and to analyze the visual improvement with the devices. Methods: A retrospective review of 300 electronic medical records of patients with cone dystrophy, cone–rod dystrophy, and rod–cone dystrophy referred to the low vision care (LVC) clinic for the first time between 2014 and 2016 at a tertiary eye care center was done. Collected data included the demographic profile of patients, details of LVDs, and best-corrected vision. Results: Out of 300 patients, 62.6% (n = 188) were male and 37.3% (n = 112) were female. Of the cases, 50% (n = 150) had cone–rod dystrophy, 45% (n = 135) had cone dystrophy, and 5% (n = 15) had rod–cone dystrophy. The most commonly prescribed LVD was SEE-TV binocular telescope (n = 6, 2.0%) for distance and dome magnifier (n = 60, 20%) for near. ET-40 dark grey tint (20.6%) was preferred for managing photophobia. There was a statistically significant difference in both distance and near visual acuities with LVDs (P < 0.05) in all categories, except rod–cone dystrophy. Conclusion: Early diagnosis with appropriate prescription of LVDs including tints helps in achieving good quality of vision in patients with cone-related dystrophies.