Purpose: To develop and compare classical liposomes (CL), stealth liposomes (SL) and super-stealth liposomes (SSL) encapsulating lumefantrine for intravenous administration. Method: CL, SL or SSL were prepared by thin-layer evaporation… Click to show full abstract
Purpose: To develop and compare classical liposomes (CL), stealth liposomes (SL) and super-stealth liposomes (SSL) encapsulating lumefantrine for intravenous administration. Method: CL, SL or SSL were prepared by thin-layer evaporation method and evaluated for particle size, polydispersity index (PdI), encapsulation efficiency and short-term stability. Pharmacodynamic study using mice infected with Plasmodium berghei was also carried out. Results: The particle sizes (nm) and PDI of the liposomes were: CL (248 ± 44.89; 0.78 ± 0.02), SL (235.8 ± 45.18; 0.39 ± 0.06) and SSL (238.2 ± 23.0; 0.24 ± 0.04). Encapsulation efficiency was highest in SSL (66 %), followed by SL (44.4 %) and then by CL (42.5 %). SSL was the most stable after 72 h of storage. In vivo, lumefantrine produced significant reduction in parasitaemia after 7 days (p < 0.05) by SSL (68.3 ± 8.9 %) followed by CL (55.8 ± 15.2 %) and then SL (53.4 ± 14.9 %). Conclusion: SSL formulation of lumefantrine exhibits good physicochemical and pharmacodynamic potentials and should be further investigated in future studies for the treatment of malaria.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.