LAUSR

OBJECTIVE Pharmacists are in a distinctive position to champion opioid stewardship principles in communications with prescribers and patients. This effort is focused on elucidating perceived barriers to uphold these principles observed in pharmacy practice. DESIGN Qualitative research study. SETTING A healthcare system, consisting of inpatient and outpatient settings across several United States (US) states in both rural and academic settings. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-six pharmacists who represented the study setting in the sole healthcare system. INTERVENTIONS Five virtual focus groups were conducted with the 26 pharmacists from inpatient and outpatient settings across four states in both rural and academic settings. Trained moderators conducted 1-hour focus group meetings that consisted of a mix of poll and discussion questions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Participant questions were related to awareness, knowledge, and system issues affecting opioid stewardship. RESULTS All pharmacists reported their routine follow-up with prescribers when questions or concerns arise but noted workload as a barrier to meticulous review of opioid prescriptions. Participants highlighted best practices, including transparency on the rationale for guideline exceptions to improve the management of after-hours concerns. Suggestions were integration of guidelines into prescriber and pharmacist order review workflows and a more visible prescriber review of prescription drug monitoring programs. CONCLUSIONS Improvements in communication and transparency of information related to opioid prescribing between pharmacists and prescribers would enhance opioid stewardship. Integration of opioid guidelines into opioid ordering and review would improve efficiency, guideline adherence, and, most importantly, patient care.