AIM Some meta-analyses have focused on foramen magnum decompression with duraplasty (PFDD) and without duraplasty (PFD) in paediatric or mixed populations. Nevertheless, no meta-analysis has evaluated adults only. This study… Click to show full abstract
AIM Some meta-analyses have focused on foramen magnum decompression with duraplasty (PFDD) and without duraplasty (PFD) in paediatric or mixed populations. Nevertheless, no meta-analysis has evaluated adults only. This study aimed to include new relevant findings in a systematic review to provide the first comparison of PFDD and PFD in adult CM-I. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov to summarize all relevant published papers on adults. A systemic review was adopted to evaluate clinical or radiological improvement, surgical complications, and reoperation rates between the PFD and PFDD groups. RESULTS Nine papers containing information on 497 adult participants met the criteria. PFDD was related to a lower revision rate (RR=2.96, 95% CI: 1.34-6.51, P=0.007) but a higher complication rate (RR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.22-0.55, P 0.00001). No significant difference was noted between PFD and PFDD in terms of overall symptom improvement (RR=0.93, 95% CI: 0.84-1.03, P = 0.17) or syringomyelia reduction (RR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.63-1.12, P = 0.24). No significant difference in symptom improvement was observed between patients with syringomyelia (RR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.69-1.08, P = 0.20) and patients without syringomyelia (RR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.68-1.30, P = 0.73). CONCLUSION This systematic review of observational studies reveals that PFDD may provide lower revision rates but pose a higher risk than PFD in the management of CM-I in adults. However, PFD is similar to PFDD in clinical and radiological improvements.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.