LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Coil volume embolization ratio for preventing recanalization after portal vein embolization.

Photo by marcinjozwiak from unsplash

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the optimum volume embolization ratio (VER) for the prevention of recanalization after portal vein embolization (PVE) and the influence of recanalization… Click to show full abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the optimum volume embolization ratio (VER) for the prevention of recanalization after portal vein embolization (PVE) and the influence of recanalization on future liver remnant (FLR) function using technetium-99m galactosyl human serum albumin single-photon emission computed tomography (99mTc-GSA SPECT/CT) fusion imaging. METHODS We analyzed procedural data of 18 patients who underwent PVE from 2015 to 2018. A total of 29 portal branches were embolized (12 anterior branch, 11 posterior branch, 4 left branch, 2 right branch) with absolute ethanol and coils. Portal vein recanalization was evaluated three weeks after PVE by contrast-enhanced CT. We classified the treated portal branches as non-recanalized and recanalized. VER was compared between the groups. In addition, for each patient, we calculated and evaluated the ratio of FLR volume to total liver volume (volumetric %FLR), FLR count to total liver count on 99mTc-GSA SPECT/CT fusion imaging (functional %FLR), and functional-volumetric ratio (functional %FLR/ volumetric %FLR). RESULTS Twenty-six portal branches showed no recanalization (non-recanalized group, n=26, 89.7%), while three portal branches showed recanalization (recanalized group, n=3, 10.3%). The median VER was 4.94% (3.12%-11.1%) in the non-recanalized group and 3.49% (2.76%-4.32%) in the recanalized group, which was significantly different between the groups (p = 0.045, Mann-Whitney U test). The median functional-volumetric ratio was 1.16 (1.03-1.50) in non-recanalized patients (n=15, 83.3%) and 1.01 (0.96-1.13) in recanalized patients (n=3, 16.7%), and it was significantly higher in the non-recanalized patients (p = 0.021, Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSION The VER for preventing recanalization after PVE was approximately 5% (> 4.94%). 99mTc-GSA SPECT/CT fusion imaging revealed a decrease in FLR function due to recanalization after PVE.

Keywords: recanalization; embolization; ratio; volume; flr; portal vein

Journal Title: Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.