LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Can we trust remote sensing ET products over Africa?

Photo from wikipedia

Abstract. Evapotranspiration (ET) is one of the most important components in the water cycle. However, there are relatively few direct measurements of ET (using flux towers), whereas various disciplines ranging… Click to show full abstract

Abstract. Evapotranspiration (ET) is one of the most important components in the water cycle. However, there are relatively few direct measurements of ET (using flux towers), whereas various disciplines ranging from hydrology to agricultural and climate sciences, require information on the spatial and temporal distribution of ET at regional and global scale. Due to limited data availability, attention has turned toward satellite based products to fill observational gaps. Various remote sensing data products have been developed, providing a large range of ET estimations. Across Africa only a limited number of flux towers are available which are insufficient for systematic evaluation of remotely sensed (RS) derived ET products. Thus we propose a methodology for evaluating RS derived ET data at the basin scale using a general water balance (WB) approach, where ET is equal to precipitation minus discharge for long-term annual averages. Firstly, RS ET products are compared with WB inferred ET for basins without long-term trends present. The RS products are then assessed according to spatial characteristics through analysing two land cover elements across Africa, irrigated areas and water bodies. A cluster analysis is also conducted to identify similarities between individual ET products. Finally, the RS products are evaluated against the Budyko equation. The results show that CMRSET, SSEBop and WaPOR rank highest in terms of estimation of long-term annual average mean ET across basins with low biases. Along with ETMonitor, the same three products rank highest in spatial distribution of ET patterns across Africa. GLEAM and MOD16 consistently rank the lowest in most criteria evaluation. Many of the products analysed in this study can be trusted depending on the study under question, keeping in mind some of these products have large biases in magnitude estimation. However our recommendation would be the three highest ranked products being CMRSET, SSEBop and WaPOR.

Keywords: remote sensing; trust remote; hydrology; sensing products; across africa; long term

Journal Title: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.