LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis
.

Photo from wikipedia

PURPOSE We performed this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety between two different administration routes of bortezomib, subcutaneous and intravenous. METHODS Six retrospective studies and three randomized controlled trials… Click to show full abstract

PURPOSE We performed this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety between two different administration routes of bortezomib, subcutaneous and intravenous. METHODS Six retrospective studies and three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in our study. Data from retrospective studies or RCTs were pooled and displayed in their corresponding subgroup, retrospective studies subgroup or RCTs subgroup. We comprehensively compared the overall response rate (ORR) and the incidence of adverse events between subcutaneous and intravenous bortezomib. RESULTS We did not find statistical difference in ORR between the two administration routes. The pooled RRs for ORR were 0.99 (95% CI = 0.79 - 1.25, p = 0.95; retrospective studies subgroup) and 1.02 (95% CI = 0.93 - 1.11, p = 0.69; RCTs subgroup). Compared with intravenous bortezomib, the subcutaneous bortezomib reduced the incidence of peripheral neuropathy, both any grade and grade ≥ 3. The pooled RRs for any grade of peripheral neuropathy were 0.33 (95% CI = 0.15 - 0.71, p = 0.004; retrospective studies subgroup) and 0.55 (95% CI = 0.31 - 0.97, p = 0.04; RCTs subgroup), and for peripheral neuropathy grade ≥ 3 were 0.40 (95% CI = 0.16 - 0.95, p = 0.04; retrospective trials subgroup) and 0.39 (95% CI = 0.19 - 0.80, p = 0.01; RCTs subgroup). Only retrospective trials subgroup found that the incidence of thrombocytopenia and renal and urinary disorders were lower in subcutaneous bortezomib than in intravenous, with the pooled RRs 0.46 (95% CI = 0.29 - 0.72, p = 0.0007; retrospective trials subgroup) and 0.23 (95% CI = 0.09 - 0.56, p = 0.001; retrospective trials subgroup), respectively. The RCTs subgroup did not find statistical differences in these two adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Subcutaneous bortezomib did not significantly reduce therapeutic efficacy but resulted in a lower incidence of peripheral neuropathy than intravenous bortezomib. Compared with intravenous bortezomib, subcutaneous bortezomib might reduce the incidence of thrombocytopenia and renal and urinary disorders, but this needs more clinical trials to confirm.
.

Keywords: efficacy safety; intravenous bortezomib; bortezomib; retrospective studies; rcts subgroup; meta analysis

Journal Title: International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.