Objective. To describe a monitoring and early intervention process for students at risk of substandard performance on advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). Methods. Using a dashboard of key indicators, students… Click to show full abstract
Objective. To describe a monitoring and early intervention process for students at risk of substandard performance on advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). Methods. Using a dashboard of key indicators, students with potential deficits in knowledge, skills, or noncognitive attributes were identified as at risk of substandard performance on APPEs and placed on a list of students to be monitored during the APPE year. Employing a traffic light–based approach, at-risk students were initially designated with a monitoring status of red. If no issues were identified, students were de-escalated to yellow status and, subsequently, to green status. Monitored students who had issues or received a substandard evaluation on APPEs had a deficit-specific action plan implemented. Results. For the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 academic years, 87 of 499 students entering APPEs were monitored. Of those 87 students, 77 (88.5%) completed experiences successfully on the first attempt, but 66 (75.9%) did require extended higher-level (red or yellow) monitoring. Over these two years, 54 (62.1%) of the 87 students deemed at risk did not have a substandard performance on APPEs, with 26 in the 2018-2019 year and 28 in the 2019-2020 year. Conclusion. A student monitoring and early intervention process may be beneficial in assisting at-risk students to successfully complete APPEs.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.