Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
1
Published in 2018 at "Journal of clinical epidemiology"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.03.012
Abstract: OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) on health literacy and cancer screening and to investigate factors that may influence overall quality. STUDY DESIGN…
read more here.
Keywords:
quality;
cancer screening;
health literacy;
systematic reviews ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
1
Published in 2021 at "European journal of orthodontics"
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa074
Abstract: BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the methodological quality and risk bias of orthodontic systematic reviews (SRs) using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) and ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Review)…
read more here.
Keywords:
methodological quality;
quality;
srs;
systematic reviews ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
1
Published in 2018 at "BMC Medical Research Methodology"
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0520-z
Abstract: BackgroundThe assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) tool is widely used for investigating the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SR). Originally, AMSTAR was developed for SRs of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Its applicability to SRs…
read more here.
Keywords:
overviews reviews;
applied authors;
amstar score;
authors call ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
3
Published in 2022 at "BMC Medical Research Methodology"
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01592-y
Abstract: Background In 2007, AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews), a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews (SRs), was published, and it has since become one of the most widely used instruments for SR…
read more here.
Keywords:
systematic reviews;
amstar;
appraisal tool;
used amstar ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0
Published in 2018 at "Systematic Reviews"
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0746-1
Abstract: BackgroundSystematic reviews (SRs) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can provide the best evidence to inform decision-making, but their methodological and reporting quality varies. Tools exist to guide the critical appraisal of quality and risk of…
read more here.
Keywords:
quality;
amstar robis;
amstar amstar;
reliability ... See more keywords