Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment. Swedish women evaluated with BCCT.core and BREAST-Q™
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Breast Cancer Research and Treatment"
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4306-5
Abstract: PurposeA gold standard for evaluation of aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is still lacking. The BCCT.core software has been developed to assess aesthetic result in a standardised way. We aimed to study how the… read more here.
Keywords: quality life; bct; bcct core; breast ... See more keywords
Abstract P1-11-11: Evaluating cosmetic outcome following breast conserving surgery in trials; panel verus objective evaluation and the role of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Cancer Research"
DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p1-11-11
Abstract: Objective Cosmetic outcome is an important quality of life related endpoint following breast conserving surgery (BCS). We aim to compare the cosmetic outcome evaluated by panel and objective evaluation (BCCT.core software). Second patient reported outcome… read more here.
Keywords: panel; cosmetic outcome; bcct core; breast ... See more keywords
Do non-mammary conditions influence patients’ cosmetic perception after breast conserving surgery?
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2025 at "Frontiers in Oncology"
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1432206
Abstract: Introduction Compared to mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) guarantees equivalent local control and survival, with lower morbidity and better quality of life (QOL), even in the long term. However, some BCS patients consider the cosmetic result… read more here.
Keywords: breast; cosmetic results; bcct core; conserving surgery ... See more keywords