Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0
Published in 2018 at "Journal of clinical epidemiology"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.004
Abstract: OBJECTIVES Risk-of-bias assessment is a central component of systematic reviews, but little conclusive empirical evidence exists on the validity of such assessments. In the context of such uncertainty, we present pragmatic recommendations that promote transparency…
read more here.
Keywords:
risk;
bias assessment;
recommendations assessing;
systematic reviews ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0
Published in 2021 at "Journal of clinical epidemiology"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.012
Abstract: OBJECTIVE This paper presents a unified framework for assessment of the methodological quality of analytic study designs. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING A systematic review of 393 methodological quality assessment tools that updated a previous assessment…
read more here.
Keywords:
bias assessment;
methodological standards;
master scale;
assessment ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
2
Published in 2022 at "European journal of orthodontics"
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjac001
Abstract: AIM To assess the extent of publication bias assessment in systematic reviews (SRs) across the orthodontic literature over the last 12 years and to identify the appropriateness of assessment and association with publication characteristics, including…
read more here.
Keywords:
systematic reviews;
methodology;
publication bias;
publication ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
2
Published in 2022 at "IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters"
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2022.3205378
Abstract: In polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) images, strong scattering centers on man-made targets contaminate their adjacent weak scattering points. We can use the target null theory to mitigate this effect, so that we can acquire…
read more here.
Keywords:
theory;
null theory;
polarimetric bias;
target null ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
1
Published in 2017 at "Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi"
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.07.027
Abstract: This paper reviews the concept of risk of bias, followed by demonstrating why assessment of risk of bias in systematic reviews should be different from that of quality of evidence, methodological quality, reporting quality, precision,…
read more here.
Keywords:
quality;
risk;
bias assessment;
assessment overview ... See more keywords