Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0
Published in 2019 at "Clinical Oral Investigations"
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02931-y
Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performances of two low-shrinkage composite resins (silorane-based and methacrylate-based) in class I cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser or conventional diamond bur over 60Â months. Materials…
read more here.
Keywords:
low shrinkage;
shrinkage composite;
month;
class cavities ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0
Published in 2024 at "BMC Oral Health"
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04132-w
Abstract: The trial aimed to compare the clinical performance and radiographic success of ACTIVA BioACTIVE versus Compomer in restoring class-II cavities of primary molars. A non-inferior split-mouth design was considered. A pre-calculated sample size of 96…
read more here.
Keywords:
class cavities;
trial;
bioactive versus;
activa bioactive ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
1
Published in 2019 at "Quintessence international"
DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a42573
Abstract: OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical performance of Glass Carbomer (GC) (GCP Dental) in restoring Class II cavities in primary molars in comparison with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) and composite resin (CR) restorations. METHOD AND MATERIALS…
read more here.
Keywords:
glass carbomer;
primary molars;
cavities primary;
class cavities ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0
Published in 2025 at "Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry"
DOI: 10.4317/jced.62843
Abstract: Background Microleakage is a common problem that affects the longevity of restorative materials in Class V cavities. It is influenced by factors such as the type of restorative materials, composition of the cavity margins and…
read more here.
Keywords:
class cavities;
adhesive restorative;
self adhesive;
restorative systems ... See more keywords