Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
1
Published in 2022 at "International endodontic journal"
DOI: 10.1111/iej.13693
Abstract: AIM The aims of the study were to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews with network meta-analyses (NMAs) in Endodontics using the "A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews" (AMSTAR 2) tool, and to…
read more here.
Keywords:
systematic reviews;
review;
overall confidence;
item ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
1
Published in 2020 at "Global Spine Journal"
DOI: 10.1177/2192568220917926
Abstract: Study Design: A systematic cross-sectional survey of systematic reviews (SRs). Objective: To evaluate the methodological quality of spine surgery SRs published in 2018 using the updated AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal instrument. Methods: We identified the…
read more here.
Keywords:
confidence;
confidence results;
spine surgery;
critically low ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
1
Published in 2020 at "Global Spine Journal"
DOI: 10.1177/2192568220953937
Abstract: 1. Critical appraisal checklists assist in systematically evaluating research evidence to judge the credibility of results based on specific methodological principles. Though they cannot clearly distinguish between poor reporting and poor study methodology, biases resulting…
read more here.
Keywords:
spine surgery;
methodology;
surgery systematic;
systematic reviews ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
1
Published in 2023 at "Risks"
DOI: 10.3390/risks11050098
Abstract: The development of risk models for managing portfolios of financial institutions and insurance companies requires, both from the regulatory and management points of view, a strong validation of the quality of the results provided by…
read more here.
Keywords:
internal risk;
risk models;
risk;
confidence results ... See more keywords