Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0
Published in 2025 at "European Journal of Dentistry"
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1811961
Abstract: Abstract Objectives To assess and compare the trueness (dimensional discrepancy and degree of deviation) of various methods of impressions for All-on-4 implants. Materials and Methods This investigation employed a single-piece artificial mandibular jaw with four…
read more here.
Keywords:
degree deviation;
intraoral scanners;
impression methods;
deviation ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0
Published in 2025 at "BMC Oral Health"
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-06029-8
Abstract: To compare the accuracy of photogrammetric imaging, intraoral scanning and conventional impression technique in full-arch dental implant rehabilitation. A resin edentulous mandibular model with six parallel implants was fabricated as master model. And three impression…
read more here.
Keywords:
photogrammetric imaging;
intraoral scanning;
rms deviations;
accuracy ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
1
Published in 2019 at "Primary Dental Journal"
DOI: 10.1308/205016819827601491
Abstract: AIM The purpose of the present study was to assess the accuracy of intra-oral scans and conventional impression measured at various points on a single tooth preparation. Methods Ten conventional silicone impressions, and ten intra…
read more here.
Keywords:
accuracy intra;
impression;
intra oral;
conventional impression ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
1
Published in 2021 at "Applied Sciences"
DOI: 10.3390/app11104612
Abstract: Purpose: The aim of this study was to present a new method to analyze the three-dimensional accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions and verify the reliability of the method. Additionally, the accuracies of conventional and intraoral…
read more here.
Keywords:
new method;
conventional impression;
impression;
trueness precision ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0
Published in 2021 at "Applied Sciences"
DOI: 10.3390/app11167182
Abstract: Purpose: In this study, we aimed to compare the marginal fit of fixed dental restorations fabricated with the provisional prosthesis scanning technique versus a conventional impression technique and to determine the effect of both variables…
read more here.
Keywords:
technique;
prosthesis;
impression;
conventional impression ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0
Published in 2021 at "Materials"
DOI: 10.3390/ma14082060
Abstract: The properties of underlying substrates influence the quality of an intraoral scan, but few studies have compared the outcomes using common restorative materials. In this study, we aimed to compare the accuracy of digital and…
read more here.
Keywords:
different dental;
impression;
conventional impression;
restorative materials ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0
Published in 2022 at "Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice"
DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_1920_21
Abstract: Background to Aim: To compare the effects of disinfectants on surface roughness of the conventional impression materials following chemical disinfection procedures. Materials and Methods: Equal numbers (65 for each impression material) of disc-shaped (15 ×…
read more here.
Keywords:
roughness conventional;
surface roughness;
impression materials;
disinfectants surface ... See more keywords
Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0
Published in 2024 at "Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry"
DOI: 10.4317/jced.61606
Abstract: Background This research aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal gaps of crowns, which were produced using both digital and conventional impression techniques and cemented with various types of cement. Material and Methods For the…
read more here.
Keywords:
showed significantly;
impression methods;
marginal internal;
monolithic blocks ... See more keywords