Manipulators or Innovators? Corporate Misconduct and Green Innovation
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2025 at "Business Strategy and the Environment"
DOI: 10.1002/bse.70361
Abstract: An ongoing debate in the literature is whether rule‐breaking actors are more innovative than others. This study examines how corporate misconduct influences green innovation. We find that firms involved in misconduct experience a 14.7% reduction… read more here.
Keywords: misconduct green; misconduct; corporate misconduct; green innovation ... See more keywords
Millennial executives: effects of the age-inverse relationship in CEO–top management team on corporate misconduct in China’s construction industry
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2025 at "Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management"
DOI: 10.1108/ecam-08-2024-1058
Abstract: PurposeThis study examines whether and how the age-inverse relationship between the chief executive officer (CEO) and the top management team (TMT) affects corporate misconduct in China’s construction industry. Drawing on social identity theory, we propose… read more here.
Keywords: relationship; corporate misconduct; construction; age inverse ... See more keywords
The frequency of corporate misconduct: public enforcement versus private reality
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Journal of Financial Crime"
DOI: 10.1108/jfc-10-2018-0107
Abstract: Purpose Perceptions about the frequency of misconduct – among the public, academics and even regulators – have largely been formed by examining enforcement statistics, which rely on the detection and sanctioning of the misconduct. This… read more here.
Keywords: misconduct; enforcement; public enforcement; misconduct public ... See more keywords
Anti-Egalitarians Are Lenient Toward Corporate Misconduct: Mixed Evidence for the Role of Threat and Mind Perception
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2025 at "Social Psychological and Personality Science"
DOI: 10.1177/19485506251383988
Abstract: Although people’s ideological beliefs are key to understanding how they make moral judgments, existing research has been silent on how such ideological beliefs drive their psychological perceptions of corporations and their responses to corporate misconduct.… read more here.
Keywords: role; corporate misconduct; mixed evidence; evidence ... See more keywords