Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients - a methodological study.
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2021 at "Journal of clinical epidemiology"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.010
Abstract: OBJECTIVE To assess the methodological quality and the consideration of heterogeneity in systematic reviews (SRs). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We conducted a methodological study (CRD42019134904) and searched three databases from January 2010 to July 2019.… read more here.
Keywords: methodological quality; quality; critically low; heterogeneity ... See more keywords
Critically Low Confidence in the Results Produced by Spine Surgery Systematic Reviews: An AMSTAR-2 Evaluation From 4 Spine Journals
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2020 at "Global Spine Journal"
DOI: 10.1177/2192568220917926
Abstract: Study Design: A systematic cross-sectional survey of systematic reviews (SRs). Objective: To evaluate the methodological quality of spine surgery SRs published in 2018 using the updated AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal instrument. Methods: We identified the… read more here.
Keywords: confidence; confidence results; spine surgery; critically low ... See more keywords