Defense of the PACE trial is based on argumentation fallacies
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Journal of Health Psychology"
DOI: 10.1177/1359105317712523
Abstract: In defense of the PACE trial, Petrie and Weinman employ a series of misleading or fallacious argumentation techniques, including circularity, blaming the victim, bait and switch, non-sequitur, setting up a straw person, guilt by association,… read more here.
Keywords: pace trial; argumentation; defense pace;