Articles with "extraction surgery" as a keyword



Photo from wikipedia

Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis

Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
Published in 2021 at "Journal of Surgical Oncology"

DOI: 10.1002/jso.26552

Abstract: This study aimed to find the advantages of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for middle and low rectal cancer, compared with traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR). read more here.

Keywords: natural orifice; specimen extraction; extraction surgery; middle low ... See more keywords
Photo by jonathanborba from unsplash

Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional robotic resection for patients with colorectal neoplasms

Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
Published in 2023 at "Frontiers in Oncology"

DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1153751

Abstract: Background Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has been widely used in colorectal neoplasms. However, only a few studies have focused on robotic NOSES. This study compared the short-term clinical outcomes and long-term survival… read more here.

Keywords: surgery; natural orifice; extraction surgery; resection ... See more keywords
Photo from wikipedia

Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction surgery for right colon cancer: A propensity matching study

Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
Published in 2023 at "Frontiers in Oncology"

DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1168961

Abstract: Background The transvaginal route for specimen extraction is considered ideal for colorectal surgery, but its safety is still questioned. There has been little research on transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) in the right… read more here.

Keywords: surgery; extraction surgery; group; specimen extraction ... See more keywords
Photo from wikipedia

Strategies in infertile azoospermic patients with negative microdissection testicular sperm extraction surgery.

Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
Published in 2020 at "Turkish journal of urology"

DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20435

Abstract: Non-obstructive azoospermia is reported to affect 1 in 100 men, and despite advances in surgical practice, the succesful sperm retrieval rate for microdissection testicular sperm extraction surgery (mTESE) is only 46%. This article reviews the… read more here.

Keywords: testicular sperm; extraction surgery; microdissection testicular; sperm extraction ... See more keywords