Minimal clinically important differences after subpectoral biceps tenodesis: definition and retrospective assessment of predictive factors.
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2020 at "Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.001
Abstract: BACKGROUND Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) at 1 year after subpectoral biceps tenodesis are unknown for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scale, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain.… read more here.
Keywords: important differences; shoulder; clinically important; biceps tenodesis ... See more keywords
Minimal Clinically Important Differences and Changes in Stroke Disease-Specific Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors: A Prospective Cohort Study
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2022 at "Clinical Nursing Research"
DOI: 10.1177/10547738221113904
Abstract: The aims of the present study were to investigate changes in QOL in post-stroke patients during the first 3 months of rehabilitation treatment. We estimate minimal detectable changes (MDCs) and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of… read more here.
Keywords: important differences; minimal clinically; stroke survivors; clinically important ... See more keywords
Reliability, validity, and clinically important differences (CIDs) on the NCCN/FACT Bladder Symptom Index (NFBISI-18) among individuals with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (UC).
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2021 at "Journal of Clinical Oncology"
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.408
Abstract: 408Background: The NFBlSI-18 is a measure of advanced bladder cancer–specific symptoms composed of a total scale and 3 subscales representing physical disease–related symptoms (DRS-P), emotional di... read more here.
Keywords: clinically important; validity clinically; cancer; important differences ... See more keywords
Minimally Important Differences in Patient or Proxy-Reported Outcome Studies Relevant to Children: A Systematic Review
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Pediatrics"
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-0833
Abstract: Through a rigorous systematic review, this study provides a compendium of MIDs to better interpret the magnitude of treatment effects for PROs relevant to children. CONTEXT: No study has characterized and appraised all anchor-based minimally… read more here.
Keywords: important differences; minimally important; reported outcome; relevant children ... See more keywords